Working agreements
Same tools, branching rules, code review standards and definition of done as the in-house team.
How a small product team adds engineers and QA mid-roadmap, productive in days, without a long hiring cycle.
A SaaS company has funding and a roadmap but only four engineers. Hiring full-time takes months, and every missed quarter costs market position.
Approach
Roles, skills, seniority, time-zone overlap and the first problems to solve, so the right people are shortlisted.
Shortlisted engineers meet the team directly. The client decides, not us.
Access, codebase walkthrough, standups and a small first ticket so the first pull request is merged in week one.
Regular check-ins on delivery and fit, with the freedom to scale the team up or down on short notice.
Solution
Same tools, branching rules, code review standards and definition of done as the in-house team.
Shared channels, overlapping hours and the augmented engineers in every standup and planning session.
Decisions documented as they are made, so knowledge stays with your team.
Least-privilege access, NDAs on request and all code and IP assigned to the client.
Timeline
Days
Roles, skills and expectations agreed.
About 1 week
Shortlist and client interviews.
Week 1
Access, context and first merged pull request.
Ongoing
Adjust team size as the roadmap changes.
Goals
Targets we would agree up front and measure, not results we claim.
Tell us what you're working on. We'll reply within one business day with next steps and a clear plan.